Legal Opinion
Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided October 13, 2004No. Civ. 04-331-JDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DICLERICO, District Judge.
The defendants, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc. (“Guilford”), Pan American Airways Corp. (“Pan Am”), and Boston-Maine Airways Corp. (“Boston-Maine”), object to the magistrate’s report and recommendation (“R & R”) that an injunction issue against them pursuant to the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 152 (“the RLA”). The plaintiff, Airline Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”) has filed a response to the objection.
Standard of Revieto
ALPA’s “motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction” was referred to the magistrate under 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Bernard Cullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005