Legal Opinion

Veilleux v. City of Augusta

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 28, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

Yvonne Veilleux appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Ken-nebec County, Alexander, J.) affirming the decision of the Augusta Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) upholding the Planning Board’s denial of her application for a conditional use permit. Veilleux contends that the action of the ZBA was unlawful, arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

In February 1994 Veilleux submitted an application for a conditional use permit to the Augusta Planning Board seeking permission to replace a dwelling which she had previously removed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gorham v. Town of Cape ElizabethSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  2. Herrick v. Town of Mechanic FallsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Buker v. Town of SwedenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Enos v. Town of StetsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Town of SedgwickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Adelman v. Town of BaldwinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Sproul v. Town of Boothbay HarborSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Fitanides v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. York v. Town of OgunquitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API