Legal Opinion

Snodgrass v. Meeks

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1894No. 1,284PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Reinhard, J. —

The appellant is the administrator of the estate of Carventer Conner, deceased, and as such on the 3d day of May, 1893, filed in the court below his final settlement account. The appellee is the administrator of the estate of Sarah Conner, deceased, who was the widow of Carventer Conner. The appelle filed ex*71ceptions to the appellant’s final report on the ground that the appellant had not paid to Sarah Conner nor to the appellee, her administrator, nor to any other person for her or him the $500 to which she was entitled by section 2424, R. S. 1894 (section 2269, R. S. 1881), as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Langley v. MayhewIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Shipman v. KeysIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hurley v. McIverIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bratney v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Moore v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Young v. BiehlIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Bowman v. OlrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Pierce v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Whetsell v. LoudenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Whisnand v. FeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API