Legal Opinion

Whetsell v. Louden

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1900No. 3,209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Erom the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

—In a statement of claim filed by the appellant as administrator of the estate of Margaret Bollenbacher, deceased, against the appellee as administrator de bonis non of the estate of George Bollenbacher, deceased, it was shown, in substance, that one John C. Whisnand was by the court below duly appointed as administrator of the estate of said George Bollenbacher, deceased, and accepted the trust, and as such administrator filed an inventory in that estate, by which it was shown that said Margaret Bollenbacher, who was the widow of said George, received from *258said Whisnand, administrator,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Langley v. MayhewIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Shipman v. KeysIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hurley v. McIverIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Moore v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Boord v. BoordIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Manning v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Stiglitz v. MigatzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Barker v. BarkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API