Legal Opinion

City of Little Rock v. Griffin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 1948No. 4-8463PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. P. MoFaddin, Justice.

This appeal is designed to present issues about the Little Rock zoning ordinance (No. 5420), and also as to whether the said ordinance conflicts with ordinance No. 5454. Neither ordinance is in evidence. We do not take judicial notice of municipal ordinances. Strickland v. Little Rock, 68 Ark. 483, 60 S. W. 26; Gardner v. State, 80 Ark. 264, 97 S. W. 48; Drifoos v. Jonesboro, 107 Ark. 99, 154 S. W. 196; Skiles v. State, 150 Ark. 300, 234 S. W. 721; Lowe v. Ivy, 204 Ark. 623, 164 S. W. 2d 429; Little Rock v. Joyner, 212 Ark. 508, 206 S. W. 2d 446. So, we must…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Little Rock v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Herring v. StannusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. City of Little Rock v. Sun Building & Developing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. City of Little Rock v. JoynerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. McKinney v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Campbell v. City of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  3. City of Little Rock v. HunterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. Cheney v. East Texas Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. City of Little Rock v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API