Legal Opinion

Alfred Pittman v. Jeffrey Macomber, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 6, 2026No. 1:26-cv-03294Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALFRED PITTMAN, No. 1:26-cv-03294-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF 13 v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF 14 JEFFREY MACOMBER, et al., (ECF No. 1) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed April 30, 2026. 20 I. 21 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 22 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API