Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 2001No. A01A1276; A01A1277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

William Bennett and Joseph Louis Votta appeal from the denial of their motions for new trial following their joint trial and convictions for hunting deer over a baited field and hunting without wearing orange. Because the issues in each appeal are the sufficiency of the evidence and whether, under OCGA § 27-3-9 (c), Department of Natural Resources rangers were required to notify Bennett and Votta that the fields were baited and give them an opportunity to post the fields prior to prosecuting them, the appeals are consolidated.

1. Both Bennett and Votta challenge the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Latham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Exum v. City of ValdostaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Copher v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Redding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D. H.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. In Re DHSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API