Legal Opinion

Copher v. MacKey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 31, 1996No. A95A2037PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

We granted defendant Copher’s application for interlocutory appeal to consider two discovery orders in this automobile accident suit. The trial court concluded that the limit of 50 interrogatories set out in OCGA § 9-11-33 was a “per set” and not cumulative limit and that a statement given by Copher to his own insurance company was not work product. We disagree.

Copher and Mackey were involved in a wreck in 1993, as a result of which Mackey sued Copher. During the litigation, Mackey served three separate sets of interrogatories, no set of which totaled over 50, including…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lutz v. ForanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. City of Roswell v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Warmack v. Mini-Skools Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Ford Motor Company v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Lamad Ministries, Inc. v. Dougherty County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Latham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Nicholl v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Rolleston v. Glynn County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API