Horning v. District of Columbia
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court 1
254 U.S. 135 (1920)
HORNING
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 77.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 8, 9, 1920.
Decided November 22, 1920.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Mr. Henry E. Davis for petitioner.
Mr. Robert L. Williams, with whom Mr. F.H. Stephens and Mr. P.H. Marshall were on the brief, for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · HolmesJustice Holmes
This case comes here upon a writ of certiorari granted to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals that affirmed a conviction of the petitioner of doing business as a pawnbroker and charging more than six per cent. interest, without a license, which is…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015