Legal Opinion

Mason v. Sorrell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 1976No. 76-60PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Because appellant Ronald Mason, incompetent, had a guardian of his estate appointed prior to the date of his injuries, allegedly caused by appellee Jim M. Sorrell on January 10, 1972, the trial court by summary judgment held that his action for personal injuries filed by his guardian, The Arkansas Bank & Trust Company, on April 7, 1975, was barred by the three-year statute of limitations, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 37-206 (Repl. 1962). To sustain the action of the court, appellee contends that appellant is not entitled to the savings clause in Ark. Stat. Ann. § 37-226 (Repl.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Dignan v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abels Ex Rel. Hunt v. Genie Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sahf v. Lake Havasu City Ass'n for the Retarded & HandicappedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Weaver v. Edwin Shaw HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Fredrick C. Lyons v. Lt. Jackie Goodson, North Little Rock Police Dept., North Little Rock, ArCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Barton-Malow Co., Inc. v. WilburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API