Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Diggs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1986No. 00608PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal concerns allegations of counsel ineffectiveness for failure to raise certain grounds for suppressing two self-incriminating statements which appellant made to the police. The statements were introduced against appellant at a 1977 jury trial which resulted in appellant’s conviction for robbery and second-degree murder.

Appellant did not institute a direct appeal from the judgment of sentence rendered on his convictions but subsequently filed a pro se Post Conviction Hearing Act 1 petition which, inter alia, sought permission to file post-verdict motions nunc pro tunc.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. ChackoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. DunbarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. WestcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. BloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Com. v. Jones, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API