Legal Opinion

Palmer Ford, Inc. v. Rom

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 26, 1958No. [No. 164, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

In this motor vehicle collision case, the defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to establish primary negligence, moved for a directed verdict on the ground of contributory negligence, and objected to a portion of the court’s charge to the jury, referring to the statute prohibiting passing within a hundred feet of an intersection, as inappropriate under the facts of the case. These are the only points pressed on appeal.

The plaintiff, Rom, who operated a dry cleaning business in Hyattsville, was driving his panel delivery truck west on Hamilton Street, intending to make a left…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Bendix Radio Division of Bendix Aviation Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. v. CanolesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Wallace v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Katzel v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Smith v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grue v. SchmidbauerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Suman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Ragonese v. HilfertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Bricker v. GraceffoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Cobourn v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API