Legal Opinion

Borgman v. Yamaha Motor Corporation USA

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided February 4, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00285Unknown

1Opinion

WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA MATTHEW BORGMAN and NANCY ) BORGMAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, USA, ) ) No. 3:19-cv-0285-HRH Defendant. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Defendant moves to dismiss this action.1 This motion is opposed.2 Oral argument was requested but is not deemed necessary. Background Plaintiffs are Matthew and Nancy Borgman. Defendant is Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA. 1Docket No. 9. 2Docket No. 23. -1- Plaintiffs allege that they are residents…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Bernard Picot v. Dean WestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API