Tate v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MILLER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, to-wit: methamphetamine of less than 28 grams. V.A.C.S. Art. 4476-15, § 4.03 (repealed). Now see V.T.C.A. Health & Safety Code § 481.112. Appellant pled “true” to two enhancement allegations, and the jury assessed his punishment at 45 years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. 1 On direct appeal, the court of appeals reversed appellant’s conviction and remanded the cause for a new trial. Tate v. State, 793 S.W.2d 760 (Tex.App — Fort Worth 1990). We…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Boyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marable v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Heberling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Payne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Charles Wade Briggs v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2023
- Charles Wade Briggs v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.