Legal Opinion

Tate v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1991No. 1042-90PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, to-wit: methamphetamine of less than 28 grams. V.A.C.S. Art. 4476-15, § 4.03 (repealed). Now see V.T.C.A. Health & Safety Code § 481.112. Appellant pled “true” to two enhancement allegations, and the jury assessed his punishment at 45 years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. 1 On direct appeal, the court of appeals reversed appellant’s conviction and remanded the cause for a new trial. Tate v. State, 793 S.W.2d 760 (Tex.App — Fort Worth 1990). We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Boyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marable v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Heberling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Payne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  4. Charles Wade Briggs v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2023
  5. Charles Wade Briggs v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API