Legal Opinion

Domatti v. Exxon Corp.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided July 29, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-0526PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAUMAN S. SCOTT, Chief Judge.

This market value controversy is before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Patti Domatti, lessor, seeks from Exxon Corporation (Exxon), lessee, royalties which she claims are due under gas leases. The plaintiff contends that she is entitled to be paid royalty on the basis of the market value of the gas, but that she has been underpaid because she has been paid only on the basis of the price received by Exxon in the sale of the gas to an interstate pipeline company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee).

The pertinent facts are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Texas Oil & Gas Corporation v. VelaTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Placid Oil Company, Sola II v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoover & Bracken Energies, Inc. v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Piney Woods Country Life School v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1982
  3. Matzen v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Hoover & Bracken Energies, Inc. v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. Matzen v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API