Legal Opinion

Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Isbell Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 7 Div. 985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In the case presented on the former appeal it appeared that the money, the proceeds of thé cheek, was at the commencement of the suit in the hands of the defendant bank, and on the case made by the pleadings, consisting of the common counts, special count in assumpsit, plea 11 and replication 4 thereto, it was held that “no reason appears why plaintiff should not recover.” Commercial Casualty Insurance Co. v. Isbell National Bank, 220 Ala. 179, 124 So. 413, 415.

Along with other facts, it was alleged in the special count “that at the time the said W. S. Gillam received said cheeks he was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Hall & Brown Woodworking Machine Co. v. Haley Furniture & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Shut & KeihnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Tobias v. Josiah Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Alabama State Bank v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Dozier v. First Ala. Bank of Montgomery, NACourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Provident Life Accident Ins. Co. v. HudgensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API