Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Chanute Air Force Base Exchange

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided January 14, 1955No. Civ. 1267-DPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLATT, District Judge.

The defendant, the United States of America, by the United States Attorney, presents a motion to dismiss the complaint for the following reasons:

1. It fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted;

2. The plaintiff lacks jurisdiction over all the defendants;

3. No defendant has consented to be sued;

4. The United States was not and is not the employer of any person or agency which is alleged to have negligently caused injury to the plaintiff.

The United States also argues that Public Law 397 of the 82nd Congress, Title 5 U.S.C.A. § 150k-l provides that the Army and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pulaski Cab Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  2. United States v. Fernando S. ForfariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Howard v. Bradshaw and Ona Bradshaw v. United States of America, Howard v. Bradshaw and Ona Bradshaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Richard A. Holcombe, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  5. George Edwin Brethauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API