Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1993No. B14-91-00998-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of delivery of crack cocaine and assessed punishment at seventy-five years and a $10,000.00 fine. In four points of error, appellant contends reversible error occurred in that: 1) the trial court erroneously refused to grant an evidentiary hearing on the motion for new trial, based on ineffective assistance of counsel; 2) the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; 3) inadmissible hearsay testimony was admitted over objection; and 4) improper jury argument was allowed. We overrule points of error one through four and affirm the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Saxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. McIntire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Howard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
  3. Hart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  4. Rosales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995
  5. Pritchett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API