Howard v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALKER, Chief Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury for having committed the felony offense of Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle. The jury also found nine enhancement paragraphs contained in the indictment to be true and sentenced appellant to confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for a period of fifty (50) years. Appellant submits four points of error for our consideration, viz:
Point of Error One: The court erred when it denied appellant’s Motion For New Trial since appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel because his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Bigby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Parmer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Ryan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
- Tufele v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Grant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Eustice v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.