Legal Opinion
State v. Hubbard
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 8, 2001No. 19283-1-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
22 P.3d 296 (2001)
106 Wash.App. 149
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Josh J. HUBBARD, Petitioner.
No. 19283-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Four.
May 8, 2001.
Susan M. Gasch, Spokane, for Appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Deputy Pros. Atty., Spokane, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, A.C.J.
A plea must be voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered. An Alford[1] plea is by definition equivocal. It is nonetheless acceptable if factually supported. In re Personal Restraint of Montoya, 109 Wash.2d 270, 280-82, 744 P.2d 340 (1987). Here, Josh J. Hubbard attempted to enter a plea to first…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. NewtonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BowermanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- In re the Personal Restraint of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- In Re Personal Restraint Petition of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Thomas L. Sluman v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.