State v. Anderson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.
The issue presented is whether an individual's flight upon seeing the police is suspicious behavior sufficient in and of itself to justify a temporary investigative stop by the police. The State of Wisconsin (State) seeks review, arguing that flight from the police is sufficient to justify a stop. Because we conclude that flight from the police is a strong indication of "mens rea," i.e. a guilty mind or a guilty purpose, we conclude that behavior which evinces in the mind of a reasonable police officer an intent to flee from the police is suspicious behavior sufficient to justify a temporary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bies v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. TribettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- State v. GuzyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. EasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. KrepsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- State v. KramerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.