Hulac v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
At Law. Action by Edward V. Hulac against the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company. On motion to remand to state court.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS C. MUNGER, District Judge.
This action was brought in the state court to recover for personal injuries, and is one that arose under section 6 of the act of Congress commonly called the “Employer’s Liability Act,” approved April 22, 1908 (Act April 22, 1908, c. 149, 35 Stat. 66 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 1173]), and amended! by the act approved April 5, 1910 (36 Stat. 291, c. 143). The case was removed to this court on a petition alleging diversity of citizenship, and the plaintiff has moved to remand.
The cause of action arose before, but the action was begun after; the taking…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Van Brimmer v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Texas · 1911
- Symonds v. St. Louis & S. E. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lackey v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- De Atley v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1912
- Gamble v. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1973
- Jones v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Kelly's Adm'x v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.