O'Bannon v. Miller & Hopkins
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 1 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED— 2 Met., 360; 3 Kent’s Com., 65. 14 B. Mon., 198; 7 B. Mon.,.210; 2 B. Mon., 405. 1 Bush, 359; 2 Duvall, 170 and 432. Story on Part., secs. 135, 136, 357, 360, 674, 675, 1253. Parsons on Part., pp. 266, 345, and note. 5 B. Mon., 170-1. CITED— Civil Code, sec. 253. Story on Partnerships, secs. 97, 358, 261, 460. 3 Kent's Com.,pp. 64, 65. 13 B. Mon., 414; Wilson vs. Soper. 2 Metcalfe, 360 ; Jones, Sfc., vs.…
Read the full summary
CASE 1 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED— 2 Met., 360; 3 Kent’s Com., 65. 14 B. Mon., 198; 7 B. Mon.,.210; 2 B. Mon., 405. 1 Bush, 359; 2 Duvall, 170 and 432. Story on Part., secs. 135, 136, 357, 360, 674, 675, 1253. Parsons on Part., pp. 266, 345, and note. 5 B. Mon., 170-1. CITED— Civil Code, sec. 253. Story on Partnerships, secs. 97, 358, 261, 460. 3 Kent's Com.,pp. 64, 65. 13 B. Mon., 414; Wilson vs. Soper. 2 Metcalfe, 360 ; Jones, Sfc., vs. Lusk. 6 B. Mon., 129; Pearson óf Anderson vs. Keedy, fyc.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion oe the court:
As each partner had an implied lien for his own security on the partnership property, the appellants, as creditors of, the firm for property sold to it and appropriated to its own use, are entitled to that lien by equitable substitution.
The notes to the appellees, Miller & Hopkins, do not show on their face that they were partnership debts, but import the contrary; nor is there any proof, or even allegation, that either of them was such a debt, or that the money recited as loaned was borrowed for, or was appropriated to, partnership use. The…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Couchman's adm'r v. MaupinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
- Springfield F. M. Ins. Co. v. Htg. Nat. Bk.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Huntington National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1929