Legal Opinion
Ramsey v. Yount
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 1918No. 9,646PublishedCited by 2 opinions
From Montgomery Circuit Court; Jere West, Judge. Action by Ice H. Eamsey against Agnes E. Yount and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtIbach, J.
This is an action for partition. Appellant is the widow and was the third childless wife of Alexander F. Eamsey, deceased, who died on March 11,1907. Decedent left two children by a former marriage, one a daughter, Hepsey B. Yount, and her three children, the appellees in this appeal, and who are the grandchildren mentioned in the deed in controversy. Such deed contains the following:
“This indenture witnesseth that Alexander F. Eamsey of Montgomery county, Indiana, conveys and warrants to Ice H. Eamsey, his wife * * * for and during her natural life and at her death to descend share and share…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Washburn v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Langley v. MayhewIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Young v. BiehlIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Enyeart v. KeplerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Fry v. HareIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mercantile Commercial Bank v. Southwestern Indiana Coal Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
- Monawa Tribe No. 352 v. WileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957