Legal Opinion

Fry v. Hare

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1906No. 20,787PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Erom Hamilton Circuit Court; Ira W. Christian, J udge. Suit by William Fry and others against Freeman Hare and another. From a decree for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

—Appellants, as the heirs at law of Charles O. Fry, deceased, brought this suit for partition, alleging that they were the owners as tenants in common of an undivided one-third and appellees the owners of an undivided two-thirds part in value of the real estate in controversy. Appellees answered by general denial, and appellee Martha Hare filed a cross-complaint in three paragraphs, alleging ownership in fee of the entire property and ashing that her title be quieted. The cause was tried by the court, special findings made, conclusions of law stated thereon in favor of appellees, and decree…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. May v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Bowen v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Brannon v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Schori v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Taylor v. VossSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Coquillard v. CoquillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Timmonds v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Hadley v. KaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Town of Cicero v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API