Legal Opinion

Netermyer v. Henley

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided June 11, 1962No. Civ. No. 1366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, District Judge.

This matter is presently before the Court on defendants’ motion to quash service of summons and Marshal’s return thereon and to dismiss plaintiff’s cause of action. The grounds alleged in support of this motion are that the above-en*735titled cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations, as the summons was not lawfully or properly issued by the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana within time sufficient to prevent this cause from being barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

The Court has had the benefit of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. SaundersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ginise v. ZahariaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Stevens v. SaundersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API