Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1997No. 11-95-117-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARNOT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order revoking “shock probation.” A central issue in this appeal is the distinction between “shock probation” under TEX.CODE CRIM.PRO.ANN. art. 42.12, § 6 (Vernon Supp.1997) and “regular probation” under TEX.CODE CRIM. PRO .ANN. art. 42.12, § 3 (Vernon Supp. 1997).1 Since her conviction in 1983, Article 42.12 has been amended numerous times, and probation is now referred to as community supervision. All statutory references in the body of this opinion are to the current subsections of Article 42.12 with historical references in footnotes.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Weed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Wiltz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Beckworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles George Gould v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
  2. McGinnis, Jason E. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  3. Shortt, Bernard WinfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API