Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Rivkin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The defendant herein, Joseph D. Riv-kin, although not himself a lawyer, occupied space in the law offices of the plaintiffs’ testator, Naaman Cohen. Under an arrangement which had existed for over ten years, the decedent had loaned money to Rivkin, Rivkin had rendered services to the decedent, and a running account of the transactions had been kept by the decedent. Commissioners were appointed on the estate of the decedent, which was fully solvent, under § 45-211 of the General Statutes, to act on a claim for $31,200 which Rivkin had presented against the estate and which the executors had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guerriero v. GalassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- New Haven Savings Bank v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Bailey v. BussingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Caffrey v. AlcornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- DiFederico v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Mirto v. SullivanConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
- Deforest Industries, Inc. v. GaetanoConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.