Legal Opinion

Roll v. City of Middleton

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1989No. 16760PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION

The Court’s prior opinion dated November 4, 1988, is hereby withdrawn.

BURNETT, Judge.

This is an employment termination case involving a public employee. The principal issue is whether a jury verdict in favor of the employer should be set aside for juror misconduct. The district judge said no, and he denied the employee’s motion for a new trial. Today we vacate the judge’s order and remand the case for reconsideration of the motion. We also offer guidance on other issues, in the event a new trial is granted.

I

In 1975 Richard Roll was hired by the City of Middleton as a general…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Miller v. HallerIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Watson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BurnsideIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hughes v. STATE, ID. DEPT. OF LAWIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SeiberIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API