Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Streeter

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.

This is an application brought under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. That article is sufficiently comprehensive to provide for the review and mandate which petitioner seeks. Doubtless the article came into being to obviate the errors and confusion that for years existed between the remedies of certiorari and mandamus. (People ex rel. Schau v. McWilliams, 185 N. Y. 92, 101.)

Petitioner asks for a review of the determination of the civil service commission in refusing to allow the appeal of the petitioner from a determination of such commission. Petitioner also seeks a final order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Schau v. . McWilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Matter of Fink v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. People Ex Rel. Sweet v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Matter of Bridgman v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Bridgman v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Civil Service Commission v. FrazziniSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. Lenert v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Quinn v. StreeterNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Konieczny v. StreeterNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Gilman v. SchechterNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API