Legal Opinion

Ross v. Crane

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 6, 1935PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These are petitions for mandamus against the city clerk of Quincy; in the first the petitioner seeks to restrain the respondent from striking his name from the roll of registered voters of Quincy, and, in the second, to compel the respondent to receive and file nomination papers *30appropriate to place the name of the petitioner upon the ballot as a candidate for mayor at an election to be held in Quincy on May 21, 1935. At the hearing parties agreed upon the material facts as disclosed by pleadings and the cases were reported by the single justice without decision. The question thus presented…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Glickstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Emery's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DiPietroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Jones v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Amana Society v. SelzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API