Legal Opinion

Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace, & Agric. Implement Workers of Am. (UAW) v. Honeywell Int'l Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 29, 2018No. Case No. 11–CV–14036Published

1Opinion of the Court

*747II. BACKGROUND

For over 50 years, the UAW has represented over 4,700 retired Honeywell (and its predecessors) manufacturing employees in collective bargaining negotiations. The UAW and Defendant have been parties to a series of CBAs that were renegotiated every three or four years. In every CBA executed from the 1965 CBA up to and including the 2003 and 2007 CBAs, the Agreement Regarding Insurance provision included the following language (the "full " provision):

[T]he Company shall contribute the full premium or subscription charge applicable to the coverages of a pensioner (not including a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.