Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Respondent Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. initiated a declaratory judgment action seeking indemnification from appellant American Family Mutual Insurance Company for part of the amount that respondent paid to settle a personal injury claim on behalf of the lessee-driver. Appellant challenges the trial court’s determination that the rental contract limited respondent’s primary omnibus insurance obligations under the Minnesota No-Fault Act and that respondent was entitled to indemnification for the excess payments that it had made. We affirm.
FACTS
In July 1990, Jared Gruett rented…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Smith v. National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Leonard v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Babinski v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. AUTO-OWNERS INS. CO. INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Great West Cas. Co. v. DeckerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.