Legal Opinion

Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 2, 1994No. C9-94-346PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Respondent Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. initiated a declaratory judgment action seeking indemnification from appellant American Family Mutual Insurance Company for part of the amount that respondent paid to settle a personal injury claim on behalf of the lessee-driver. Appellant challenges the trial court’s determination that the rental contract limited respondent’s primary omnibus insurance obligations under the Minnesota No-Fault Act and that respondent was entitled to indemnification for the excess payments that it had made. We affirm.

FACTS

In July 1990, Jared Gruett rented…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Smith v. National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Babinski v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. AUTO-OWNERS INS. CO. INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Great West Cas. Co. v. DeckerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API