Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Robbins

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 13, 1913PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Bath Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages for the flooding of twO' houses and lots, owned by her, in the village of Salt Lick, caused, as alleged, by the acts of appellant in erecting concrete abutments and piers to support its brdges over ■Salt Lick and Mud Lick Creeks, and embankments approaching same, whereby the waters of the creeks were so obstructed and diverted from their natural channel and flow, as to make them back upon and overflow the property in question to its great injury. The trial resulted in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  3. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WhitsellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Central Consumers Co. v. PinkertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Apache MotorsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Price Bros. v. City of Dawson SpringsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Dugan v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Conn.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Stephens v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API