Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Stump

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894No. 14992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

The complaint in this action shows that in October, 1890, the defendant was desirous of obtaining a certain letter said to have been written by Henry H. Markham, the alleged contents of which were in dispute.

That on or about the twenty-fourth day' of October, 1890, the defendant proclaimed and asserted that he was desirous of obtaining a genuine letter written by said Markham of the alleged character and contents, and that he would pay a reward of one thousand dollars for the production to him of such genuine letter containing the disputed matter.

“That, in consideration of said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ryer v. StockwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Hewitt v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Roberts v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Roberts v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Smith v. Vernon CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Glover v. Jewish War Veterans of United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API