Wilson v. Stump
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The complaint in this action shows that in October, 1890, the defendant was desirous of obtaining a certain letter said to have been written by Henry H. Markham, the alleged contents of which were in dispute.
That on or about the twenty-fourth day' of October, 1890, the defendant proclaimed and asserted that he was desirous of obtaining a genuine letter written by said Markham of the alleged character and contents, and that he would pay a reward of one thousand dollars for the production to him of such genuine letter containing the disputed matter.
“That, in consideration of said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ryer v. StockwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Hewitt v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Roberts v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Roberts v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Smith v. Vernon CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Glover v. Jewish War Veterans of United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949