Legal Opinion

Reinhardt v. Security Insurance Co. of New Haven

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 30, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This is an action to recover on a standard fire insurance policy for $1,000 issued by defendant, on a building occupied and to be occupied only for dwelling purposes, which was issued to plaintiffs, Sebastian Huskamp and Rose Huskamp, who sue for the full amount of the policy for loss sustained by the destruction of this building by fire on June 16, 1934.

This policy contained a mortgage clause providing that loss under this policy should be payable tó F. W. Schneidewind, trustee, who is named therein, as his interest may appear, and who held a mortgage on the premises on which this building…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phenix Insurance Co. v. GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Allen v. McGillIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Reinhardt v. Security Insurance Co. of New HavenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Waggoner v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Reinhardt v. Security InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoffman & Morton Co. v. American InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. Dunton v. Connecticut Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  3. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Illinois Fair Plan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. In Re Tutu Water Wells Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Northwest National BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API