McClain v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
BOEHM, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the Marion Superior Court. The question for decision is whether the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion in limine excluding expert testimony on sleep disorders and dissociative states because the defendant, David M. McClain, withdrew his insanity defense. 1 The Court of Appeals held that evidence McClain seeks to present on automatism and sleep deprivation is a species of the insanity defense and, accordingly, is subject to the notice requirements of Indiana Code § 35-36-2-1. McClain v. State, 670 N.E.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Baird v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Fulcher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- McKnight v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Wisehart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Sanchez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Marley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- O'CONNELL v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.