Legal Opinion

Meat Producers, Inc. v. McFarland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1972No. 17747PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Justice.

The principal question is whether a cattle feeding facility emitting disagreeable odors when in operation amounts to a nuisance justifying recovery of permanent damages to adjacent land measured by reduction in market value, even though at the time of trial cattle feeding had been suspended and no odors were being produced. We hold that it is such a nuisance and that such damages are recoverable.

Plaintiff Robert McFarland owned 645 acres of land adjacent to a tract upon which defendant Meat Producers, Inc. had constructed an elaborate cattle feeding facility, referred to in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Rosenthal v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Trinity & Sabine Railway Co. v. SchofieldTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Sherman Gas & Electric Co. v. BeldenTexas Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  3. GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Ltd. Partnership v. Pascouet, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. General Mills Restaurants, Inc. v. Texas Wings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  5. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API