Legal Opinion
Weisenbach v. Kirk
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided January 7, 2009No. CA 08-508PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN B. ROBBINS, Judge.
This appeal arises from a circuit court’s vacation of a platted but unused section of a road in a subdivision. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm the trial court’s decision to vacate the road.
Appellees Larry and Melissa Kirk own Lot 28 in a subdivision platted in 1979 called Rolling Hills Estates 2nd Addition, outside Pocahontas, in Randolph County. Appellees Dewayne and Rhonda Smith own Lot 22 in that subdivision. Appellant Randy Weisenbach owns property outside and adjacent to the subdivision. A portion of one of the dedicated streets in appellees’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mamo Transportation, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. SherrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Fritzinger v. BeeneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- City of Sherwood v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- City of Jacksonville v. City of SherwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Winrock Grass Farm, Inc. v. Affiliated Real Estate Appraisers of Arkansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Myers v. BognerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
- Andreasen v. S. Mountain Estates Prop. Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Hicks v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
- Wildlife Farms II, LLC v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.