Legal Opinion
E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided October 20, 1975No. Court No. 73-9-02547PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Newman, Judge-:
Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment pursuant to rule 8.2 of tbis court; and defendant has. cross-moved fpr summary judgment pursuant to. said rule. The. parties, have agreed that there, is no genuine issue as to any material f aet.
For. the reasons set forth herein the cross-motions are denied, hut without prejudice.
The merchandise in issue is described on the invoice as “Broxodent devices (electric toothbrushes), 110 V/6.0 Hz, Model. D-ll”. These articles were imported from Switzerland at the port of New York in 1970, and were assessed with duty by the regional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Kaysons Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- United States v. L. Batlin & Son, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Weather-Rite Sportswear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- V. G. Nahrgang Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983