Legal Opinion

Allen v. Lococo

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMengler, J.

(Pro Tempore).

This is an action at law to recover damages for personal injury in an automobile collision which occurred on November 29, 1964. Plaintiff filed her complaint on October 25, 1965. An order permitting service on the Department of Motor Vehicles was entered on the same day. On October 9,1966, a default judgment ivas entered against defendant. Defendant appeared specially on December 19, 1966, and moved to quash the purported service. An order allowing the motion was entered on January 11, 1967. On March 7, 1967, upon plaintiff’s motion, an order was entered for substituted service…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Mills v. FeiockOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Railton v. RedmarOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Schulmerich v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalich v. BrysonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. PBH, Inc. v. Multnomah County AssessorOregon Tax Court · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Kalich v. BrysonOregon Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API