Legal Opinion
State v. Emerick, Unpublished Decision (8-16-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 2007No. 06 CA 45UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY.
{¶ 1} After pleading no contest to operating a vehicle while impaired, Johnny Emerick contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Emerick argues as a matter of law the trooper who stopped him lacked a reasonable, articulable suspicion for making the stop. He also contends the trial court's factual finding that a crack in his windshield was visible to the trooper is not supported by the record.
{¶ 2} Emerick bases his argument that the stop was improper on the premise that "the crack in his windshield did not constitute a violation" of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. LittlefieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- N. Kingsville v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. MundyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.