Legal Opinion

Overstock.com, Inc. v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2013PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Lippman.

Plaintiffs challenge Tax Law § 1101 (b) (8) (vi) (the Internet tax), alleging that it is unconstitutional on its face because it violates the Commerce Clause by subjecting online retailers, without a physical presence in the state, to New York sales and compensating use taxes. They also maintain that the Internet tax violates the Due Process Clause by creating an irrational, irrebuttable presumption of solicitation of business within the state. We reject plaintiffs’ facial challenges.

*591L

Plaintiff Amazon.com, LLC is a limited liability company formed in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Crawford v. Marion County Election BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Brightonian Nursing Home v. DainesNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Krieger v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 2013
  3. City of New York v. ChavezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Performance Marketing Ass'n, Inc. v. HamerIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Travelocity.Com LP v. Wyoming Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API