Legal Opinion

Application of Harry Sponnoble

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 16, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8007Published

1Opinion of the Court

405 F.2d 578

Application of Harry SPONNOBLE.

Patent Appeal No. 8007.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

January 16, 1969.

Raywood H. Blanchard, Kalamazoo, Mich., (Eugene O. Retter, George T. Johannesen, Kalamazoo, Mich., of counsel) for appellant.

Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D. C., (Fred W. Sherling, Washington, D. C., of counsel) for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, SMITH, ALMOND and BALDWIN, Judges.

BALDWIN, Judge.

1

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals,1 affirming the examiner's rejection of the sole remaining claim in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Application of Claus L. SporckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Application of Herbert C. Murray and Durey H. PetersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  3. Application of John O. AntonsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  4. Application of Leslie E. SoderquistCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Application of William F. BillingsleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API