Legal Opinion

Application of William F. Billingsley

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 29, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6549PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of claims 49 and 50 of appellant’s application for a patent on a vehicle tire.

Claim 49, which is representative of the appealed claims is as follows:

“49. A tire adapted for good traction in soft ground as well as on hard wet surfaces of pavement and ice and packed snow, said tire having a reinforced body and a tread of resilient rubber material, said tread comprising a pair of axially spaced composite traction elements extending…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re KellerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. Application of Leslie E. SoderquistCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  3. Application of Leo v. BentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. Application of Richard Cleminson Cussons and Douglas DewarCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. Application of John T. RauenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API