Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Frank
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 25, 1991No. 90 C 6816PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Anthony Frank’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For reasons that follow, the court grants the motion.
FACTS
Plaintiff, Donald R. Barrett (“Barrett”) is a disabled veteran who suffers from a hearing impairment and receives compensation based on ten percent disablement. He applied for and was offered a position as a distribution clerk with the postal service’s Moraine Valley facility, scheduled to begin February 14, 1987. Shortly before that date, he was in an automobile…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- B. Doe, M.D., on Behalf of B. Doe and B. Doe's Patients v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Perkins v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Walter D. McGuinness v. United States Postal Service, Felix J. Jackson, and A.A. Winslow, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- James KONTOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, William Brock, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roepsch v. BentsenDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- Johnson v. RunyonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Marciniak v. BrennanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017