Commercial Bank v. Hart
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, C. J.
On August 7, 1893, the defendants executed to plaintiff their promissory note for $5,000, due in three months from date, providing for ten per cent, attorney’s fee. It is alleged that plaintiff was the owner of the note, and that it was a corporation. Defendant denied any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegation concerning the plaintiff being a corporation ; admitted that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of the note sued upon, but denied that the whole amount thereof, or any part thereof, either…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rockford Shoe Co. v. JacobWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Staver & Walker v. MissimerWashington Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- R. J. Menz Lumber Co. v. E. J. McNeeley & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Condon Nat. Bank v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Keeler v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- White v. MillionWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Stankey v. GodwinWashington Supreme Court · 1930