Legal Opinion

Guild v. McDaniels

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from, Washington District Court. Action to recover upon a promissory note. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

On the 1st day of April, 1880, John Guild executed a promissory note to the order of J. S. Springer, for $325, payable twelve months after date, with interest at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum. J. R. McDaniels, at the request of Guild, signed the note as a joint maker, but he was in fact only a surety; it was then delivered to J. S. Springer, *549the payee. Subsequently J. R. McDaniels died, and Cynthia E. McDaniels was appointed and qualified as administratrix of his estate. Afterward J. S. Springer informed Mrs. McDaniels that he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crippen v. ChappelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Lidderdale v. RobinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia · 1824
  3. Waldrip v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Harrah v. JacobsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Kupfer v. SponhorstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blitz ex rel. Erickson v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Wright v. JenksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Stein, Sheriff v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Boggs Oil & Drilling Co. v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Keyes v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API