Legal Opinion
Haynes v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 19, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By order dated September 29,1983, this court granted a motion by defendant New York City Transit Authority insofar as it requested reargument of an appeal which resulted in a decision and order of this court, both dated June 13, 1983, reversing an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buschmann, J.), dated September 13, 1982. The order reversed had, inter alia, granted the Transit Authority’s motion to vacate its default. This court reversed the order, on the law and the facts, and denied the Transit Authority’s motion to vacate its default (Haynes v City of New York, 95 AD2d 799).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Heiman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Somma v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Bensen v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ansaldo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKenna v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Lewis v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Garcia v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993