Legal Opinion

Harms v. City of Beatrice

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1942No. 31216PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries sustained when she stepped on a defective meter box alleged to have been negligently maintained by the city of Beatrice. The trial court, sustained a general demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended petition and, the plaintiff having elected to stand thereon, entered a judgment of dismissal. Plaintiff appeals.

The petition alleges that the defendant city owned and maintained a system of water-works for the purpose of furnishing water at commercial rates to the inhabitants of the city. As a part of the water-works system the city maintained a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Henry v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Des Moines v. Des Moines Water Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Nord v. Butte Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Fisher v. St. Joseph Water Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marshall v. City of CentraliaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mattson v. Central Electric & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  3. Helz v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Crosswhite v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hofferber v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API